I think that the real truth about the situation in my country, about the “relationship” with the environment is alarming.  I see every day how the people doesn’t interesting in to protect the environment. Besides, the environment situation is more dangerous not only for the same nature, also for the people at the consequences in the long run.  

In my case, I believe that I contributed with the effort minimal. I try to be a careful person with the environment but I don’t think that my “help” are enough. I have a obsession with the some things that help with the same point. For example, I always try to throw all my rubbish in the trash or I prefer to save my garbage in the satchel anything but that to scatter.

In my viewpoint I think that the government and its programmes about environment are not enough because they don’t prepare to people with the satisfactory actions for to help with the environment. I believe that when are not have in this country, some the appropriate methods in the education, the people cannot believe a good result. Besides, the government should propose and provides the daily habits against these relevance problems.  Even, the supermarkets and the retail company have its “politics” for the environment with the recycling shopping bags that are be friendly with the same point.

 I know that usually the people recycling many elements us the bags, battery, glass and plastic in general.  Besides have places and special garbage collector for this activity that to help the environment.

The people do many activities for this same problem. Some people are more workers for this same point, other just try to do the minimal habits, as me.  Someday I will work more for to save the nature, because the environment will have much problems that will are a option, will are the necessity...

about Santiago...

I was born in a different city that Santiago.  I lived in Osorno city, in the south of Chile.  In the 2009, I arrived in Santiago because the academic offers in my city are few. I didn’t like my city, because I think that the opportunities are more restrictive.
So, I know the Santiago city just any years old.  However, I believe that Santiago not “sucks” as say the all people that ask me:  Why you arrive Santiago with the all bad things it has? (Pollution, expensive, dangerous city, etc) 
I believe that the “capital” city has many positives aspects that the people don’t see, maybe they aren`t want to know the other “reality” about other regions of the country. For example, I remember when in same year that I arrived,   I saw more “jobs offers” for distinct employment. So I thought:   How the people in this city say that are not have employments if in my region are not anything possibility as these?  I believe that this example shows the “differences” between regions and for this I think that Santiago is not very very bad. I don`t know if you understand my idea :S
I like other things of this city as to go the Cerro San Cristòbal or going the museum.  However, Santiago has other bad things. I hate the “rhythm life” of this city. All people always run as crazy man. Sometimes,   there are not reasons for does it.  Other thing that I hate is the transport cost. Is more expensive!  Besides, I dislike the excessive arrogance that I see in the people when I going to the “smart neighbourhood”. 
I would like to change some aspects. I believe that is more necessary to create many cycle paths in this city, also the towns council must to invest  more resources for to clean the streets in the “peripherals   sectors”.  Why the people that live here cannot have clean spaces?

Today the topic for this blog is about Chilean person.  In my opinion, I think that the greatest Chilean is Salvador Allende. I remember that the 2010, an official TV government show did this same question. The result about that was the same answer as my opinion. Well, this TV show was other moment for this country shows the imperiously need of divides the people interests.   

I believe that this person was the great Chilean because he did many government programs for this poor people. I think that in his government the social politics had the most rate that at anything other president.  He tried to counteract the economics differences with greatest socials programs, more educations and increase the jobs.   In my opinion, I think that the some people remember this personage   because he wrestled   against other politics that were not for to benefit. Besides, Salvador Allende had other positive aspect, as charisma, oratory and the principal thing: the social compromise. Maybe, I still believe in this.

I think, that if he were alive, I could ask many questions. For example: why you tried many times be a Chilean president? How you confront the fail in your many candidacies? Who is your principal politics person? Why?

I think that the Chilean History is haven’t more precision about Salvador Allende. Obviously, because all people knows how finished this government.  This dramatic Chilean episode had the great impact at the nation conscience. Salvador Allende had many detractors and critics for his socialism and his politic, principally, in the rich people and the “right” wing thought.

I always have a question:  what could happned if he could finish his government? I think that this country could be more distinct.   Maybe, maybe...

Hello guys:

Today, I will to talk you about a video that speaks about the one of most important human faculty: the language.

In this video, is very interest how the professor explain the development languages since the Homo erectus until now. I think that he says more important aspect about this, but he not explains the relation about the human with the nature as cognitive process.  Because the language develops EVER are with the nature conditions for the communication. I think that the develop language is not just relation between the humans for exist. About this point, many people believe the language just gestated with the one relation between the human. Is really necessary consider the phonology as the great aspect in the first relation for to communicate. I think this.  I don’t know if you can understand me about my point :c

About the second part in this video I believe that is very very necessary to consider his argument about one unique language. I feel fear for this.  I don’t believe in this because it would be the most biggest victory of globalization and its capacity of make all equal.  

Hello, today I will to talk about you this one page that helps many people for learn the English language.  This website has this web direction: http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/

I think that website is very interesting.  This page has many topics about how I can learn more aspect about   specific functions communicates about English language. I like very much some points about its methodology for the people.  I agree with their methods. I think that is easier when the English program are approach in propose all thematic that the people can in the routine. For example, I show a section that has all grammatical components. This name section called “Grammar, Vocabulary & pronunciation”.  Personally, I think that this section is very important, because to permit that the people understand all rules about this language. Besides, in this website, this same content are explicated with many examples that the people use in his life, as some questions, propositions, orders , etc.

You can into put in a practice all aspects immediately. I like very much this sections because I don`t understand more English rules languages.

Hello everyone ! Today I will to talk  you  about   the last decision of The Corte Suprema about the mapuche’s criminal proceedings. I think that is amazing  how the social pressure has relevant in legal process. Unfortunately, again the “final” decision was created when the four mapuches (Llaitul, Llanquileo, Huenuche and Huillacal) decided start a hunger strike. But, what is the reason of strike? Is very simple, they want a fair trail. They four mapuches, which are members of the CAM( Coordinadora Arauco malleco)   were convicted to prision because  at the trial, the judge decided that    committed a attempted murder against the lawyer Mario Elgueta. The Corte Suprema said that the prision against the mapuches would decrease. However the mapuches   want to continue with the strike. The problem at the trial is that the lawyers has many arguments based in laws against the terrorism. Besides, the facts that the lawyers show not have a complete true. The arguments are confused.

I think that the reason of the strike is very fair, because the mapuches just want a fair trial.

Also, the relations  betwen the goverment and  the mapuches is an problem that need many people  with the plural information for understand it. The chilean history  are accomplice in this problem. I think the mapuches at strike are motivated for a  politic reivindication for their lands usurped when the chilean goverment imposed all for to aproppiate.

Hello classmates

I will to talk you about something that simply I hate: the problem about the information that shows the TV and newspapers. This problem is simple, they not give all information that the people needs for do an own opinion. I show one point, for example: when last year CNTV imposed a great complaint to the TV channels because they don’t show the Mapuche  strike. I think the problem is don’t’ haves the plural view when the TV try to exposes information to the people. I don’t’ try to impose my own view about this especially problem, I don’t interested in this. I would like that information are plural views. However, the internet is the best solution about this problem. I love it this option. This space offers the possibilities that all opinion can shows. Besides, is possible that the people can exposes their many experiences about a problem, solutions and controversial news.

Now, many channels speak about this fact. They call “social networks”.  I believe that tendency is good, but not proposes the concrete solutions. Maybe,   they don’t try to do something for the “Mather earth”, just try to exposes your particular opinion. I think that this gesture is the first step for “democratic community”.  However, such is normal, the TV and great corporations try to ignore this possibility in this channels. I don’t believe when the news says: “we are worried for you” This is a great lie.