about Santiago...

I was born in a different city that Santiago.  I lived in Osorno city, in the south of Chile.  In the 2009, I arrived in Santiago because the academic offers in my city are few. I didn’t like my city, because I think that the opportunities are more restrictive.
So, I know the Santiago city just any years old.  However, I believe that Santiago not “sucks” as say the all people that ask me:  Why you arrive Santiago with the all bad things it has? (Pollution, expensive, dangerous city, etc) 
I believe that the “capital” city has many positives aspects that the people don’t see, maybe they aren`t want to know the other “reality” about other regions of the country. For example, I remember when in same year that I arrived,   I saw more “jobs offers” for distinct employment. So I thought:   How the people in this city say that are not have employments if in my region are not anything possibility as these?  I believe that this example shows the “differences” between regions and for this I think that Santiago is not very very bad. I don`t know if you understand my idea :S
I like other things of this city as to go the Cerro San Cristòbal or going the museum.  However, Santiago has other bad things. I hate the “rhythm life” of this city. All people always run as crazy man. Sometimes,   there are not reasons for does it.  Other thing that I hate is the transport cost. Is more expensive!  Besides, I dislike the excessive arrogance that I see in the people when I going to the “smart neighbourhood”. 
I would like to change some aspects. I believe that is more necessary to create many cycle paths in this city, also the towns council must to invest  more resources for to clean the streets in the “peripherals   sectors”.  Why the people that live here cannot have clean spaces?

Today the topic for this blog is about Chilean person.  In my opinion, I think that the greatest Chilean is Salvador Allende. I remember that the 2010, an official TV government show did this same question. The result about that was the same answer as my opinion. Well, this TV show was other moment for this country shows the imperiously need of divides the people interests.   

I believe that this person was the great Chilean because he did many government programs for this poor people. I think that in his government the social politics had the most rate that at anything other president.  He tried to counteract the economics differences with greatest socials programs, more educations and increase the jobs.   In my opinion, I think that the some people remember this personage   because he wrestled   against other politics that were not for to benefit. Besides, Salvador Allende had other positive aspect, as charisma, oratory and the principal thing: the social compromise. Maybe, I still believe in this.

I think, that if he were alive, I could ask many questions. For example: why you tried many times be a Chilean president? How you confront the fail in your many candidacies? Who is your principal politics person? Why?

I think that the Chilean History is haven’t more precision about Salvador Allende. Obviously, because all people knows how finished this government.  This dramatic Chilean episode had the great impact at the nation conscience. Salvador Allende had many detractors and critics for his socialism and his politic, principally, in the rich people and the “right” wing thought.

I always have a question:  what could happned if he could finish his government? I think that this country could be more distinct.   Maybe, maybe...